Skip to content

fix: add //go:build !js to postgres wrapper to fix tinygo/wasm compilation#9

Merged
kalbasit merged 1 commit intomainfrom
fix/postgres-wrapper-no-js-build-tag
Mar 21, 2026
Merged

fix: add //go:build !js to postgres wrapper to fix tinygo/wasm compilation#9
kalbasit merged 1 commit intomainfrom
fix/postgres-wrapper-no-js-build-tag

Conversation

@kalbasit
Copy link
Owner

The postgres wrapper imports github.com/lib/pq which uses TLS and
crypto APIs unavailable in tinygo's stdlib. Adding the !js build tag
excludes the postgres wrapper when building for wasm targets.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 noreply@anthropic.com

…ation

The postgres wrapper imports github.com/lib/pq which uses TLS and
crypto APIs unavailable in tinygo's stdlib. Adding the !js build tag
excludes the postgres wrapper when building for wasm targets.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request resolves a compilation failure for projects targeting WebAssembly (WASM) with TinyGo when using the Postgres database wrapper. By conditionally applying a build constraint, the Postgres-specific code, which relies on incompatible TLS and crypto APIs, is now correctly excluded from WASM builds, enhancing the tool's compatibility across different environments.

Highlights

  • Postgres Wrapper Compilation Fix: A //go:build !js build tag was added to the Postgres wrapper template. This change prevents compilation errors when building for WebAssembly (WASM) targets using TinyGo, as the github.com/lib/pq dependency uses TLS and crypto APIs not available in TinyGo's standard library for WASM.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for GitHub and other Google products, sign up here.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@kalbasit kalbasit merged commit 8e54855 into main Mar 21, 2026
3 checks passed
Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request aims to fix a tinygo/wasm compilation issue for the postgres wrapper by adding a //go:build !js build tag. The approach is correct, but the implementation in the Go template has a whitespace issue that makes the build tag invalid. I've provided a critical review comment with a code suggestion to fix the template logic, ensuring the build tag is generated correctly while maintaining clean formatting for all database engines.

Comment on lines +57 to +60
{{- if .Engine.IsPostgres}}
//go:build !js

{{end -}}

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

critical

The whitespace control in this template block is incorrect. The {{- if on the first line will remove the preceding newline, causing the //go:build directive to be appended to the // Code generated by sqlc-multi-db. DO NOT EDIT. comment. This makes the build tag ineffective as it's no longer on its own line at the top of the file.

I've adjusted the template's whitespace handling to ensure the build tag is correctly placed on a new line and that there is a single blank line separating it from the package declaration, which is required by the Go toolchain. This fix also ensures that non-postgres generated files maintain clean formatting.

Suggested change
{{- if .Engine.IsPostgres}}
//go:build !js
{{end -}}
{{if .Engine.IsPostgres}}
//go:build !js
{{- end -}}

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 28.83%. Comparing base (0c497ea) to head (b9a21a0).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main       #9   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   28.83%   28.83%           
=======================================
  Files           6        6           
  Lines         697      697           
=======================================
  Hits          201      201           
  Misses        485      485           
  Partials       11       11           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants